- Home
- Poker
- Tournaments
- WSOP
- The WSOP Extension
The WSOP Extension
- By Warren Karp
- Published 05/3/2008
- WSOP
-
Rating:




On May the
1st, Harrah's announced what I think is the biggest change in WSOP
history. They extended the WSOP, not in number of days, but in when the
final table of the Main Event will be taking place.
When you get to the final 9
players this year, those chips will be bagged up as usual and the players will
go home for the night, thinking of the possibility of becoming the 2008 World Series of Poker
Champion. That’s when history ends and a new era begins. Nine players will then
have to wait till November 9th and 10th to play it out.
This decision, which was
made by the powers that be at the World Series of Poker and in my opinion with strong urging by
ESPN, will have both positive and negative effects.
The players committee which
consists of TOP name players all gave their blessing and it’s no wonder, should
one of them make the final table, it would mean a ton of $$ compared to the
average guy getting there.
To see how the masses feel
about the change, it’s easy to see that there are many on both sides of the
fence, albeit from what I’ve read; more negative than positive. For a true
sampling, look at the many poker forums around the world.
This article is my first
thoughts on the subject as it just came to light, so I’m sure I’ll think of
more as time passes, but in the meantime, let me start with the positives.
During that 4 month period
of time:
Players will get the
equivalent of 9th place $$ to spend over the 4 months, this will
allow then to play in other events that are high profile and get endorsement $$
Players will get more
notoriety (15 minutes of fame extended)
Players will probably get
more $$ to wear ‘logo-gear”, which I don’t take lightly and there will probably
be tons of $$ for the waiting participants wearing gear as ESPN chronicles
there life.
Players will get a break
from the 7 day journey that gets them to the FT
There are plenty more
positives, but:
What happens when players
have 4 months to make a deal?
As a Pro, I count on the
fact that I’ve been at 100 final tables in my career and the FT of a big event
isn’t something you get a chance to practice. What happens when players can get
expert coaching and now have the 9th place money to pay for it?
What happens when players
get a chance to watch the first 7 days of the WSOP broadcast, setting up
their final table play?
What happens to the
tradition of finishing the final table with no break in-between, the gruel
being the time honored tradition?
Does this time allow for
impropriety, you bet!
Does this time allow for
strong arm influence, you bet!
What do you think of the final table
playing down to 2 on the 9th and then heads up play on the 10th.
What if one hand decides it all, or after they lose 7 players the chip count is
95% to 5%? You may think I’m
crazy, but what happens when someone dies during those 4 months? Some year
that’s going to happen, then what, take his chips out of play? Will that player be blinded off?
I can imagine a scenario
where the player who has died is awarded 9th place and the family of
the player sues Harrah’s for 8 million dollars.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
1 Response to "The WSOP Extension" 
|
said this on 11 May 2008 9:19:42 AM AST
This is the first I have heard of this new development and I'm stunned. The only positive I see is that it MAYBE avoids knowing ahead of time who wins it all prior to watching on ESPN. Of course, that depends on how ESPN handles the FT television broadcast. We still will find it hard to avoid knowing who makes it to the FT. It's like that Seinfeld episode where Jerry videos a Mets game and tries not to have someone tip him off to the outcome prior to watching it. I love watching the WSOP on ESPN, but knowing the eventual winner sometimes takes some of the excitement out of the individual hands. Last year, I read that Jerry Yang (who?!) won. While watching, I unfortunately knew who was going to win when he was all-in. Still fun to watch, but takes something out of the excitement quotient.
But will this delay change anything in this regard? They would have to find a way to broadcast live. I'm willing to watch that much Poker, but I'm sure I'm in a minority. And could ESPN devote the time or generate the advertising sales to undertake such a bold venture? Probably not. I'll watch as always, but I may not like it.
|

Author)