The Case For the UIGEA

According to a 1991 study by the American Psychological Association (APA), between 10-15% of young people have experienced one or more types of gambling problems. Lawmakers can easily take this statistic to their constituents and argue they are helping to prevent the onset of potential gambling problems for their children. In the same study, the APA pointed out that internet gambling is a solitary activity which increases its danger for people who may become addicted.

Another potential reason to be in favor of the UIGEA is to help prevent money laundering or other fraudulent activities. In August of 2009 authorities in New York filed charges against over 80 men with ties to the organized crime who had been heavily involved in online gambling. Having charges filed against organized crime shows that the fear of criminals using online gambling has moved from theory to practice. It may not be fair to characterize online gaming as a tool of criminals but in situations like this it does nothing but give a black eye to honest poker players.

Aside from any statistic or attention grabbing headline, there is a portion of the country that believes gaming of any form is immoral. This principled stand will not be swayed by arguments of personal freedom or potential tax revenue. Arguing against a principle is a fruitless endeavor but the impact they have can be felt in the voting booth. As long as a congressman’s district is against online gaming it is likely the congressman will be too.

Perhaps poker players shouldn’t be up in arms over the UIGEA. This truly could be a case of the government looking out for the best interest of all its citizens. As this Congress moves forward if the UIGEA comes up again for debate or possible repeal you will hear all of these arguments and more. The vast majority of online poker players are recreational. As an online poker player ask yourself if the UIGEA is helping the country and if the benefits outweigh the detriments.